Thursday, July 24, 2014
California Supreme Court Clarifies “Commissioned Inside Salespersons Exemption"
The California Supreme Court just ruled that an employer satisfies the minimum earnings requirement for the "commissioned inside salespersons exemption" only if the employer actually pays the required minimum earnings of 1.5 times the minimum wage during each pay period. An employer may not allocate wages paid in one pay period to a prior pay period to cure a shortfall.
Tuesday, July 1, 2014
Important Job Application Procedures To Reduce Risk
Job applications and your interview notes should only hold job
performance related information and should document only the valid relevant job
performance reasons for selecting or rejecting applicants.
Require signed applications from all candidates
to avoid future claims for primarily discrimination and other potential grounds, such as privacy and defamation.
Include the following in your job applications and have job applicants initial each:
- State that either employee or employer may terminate employment at any time and for any reason, other than an illegal reason.
- State that applicant’s signature is an authorization to check references.
- State that applicant’s signature means that a drug test, if your policy requires same, will be required to be taken as a condition to hiring.
- State that applicant’s signature means that an arbitration agreement, if your policy requires same, will be required to be signed as a condition to hiring.
- State that applicant’s signature means that all of his or her information is true, and that any omission or false information will be grounds for rejection of the application or grounds for later termination if applicant is hired.
Internet Copyright Infringement Is Now More Clear
In American Broadcasting Cos., Inc. v. Aereo, Inc., the US Supreme Court ruled that Aereo's transmission of over-the-air broadcasts to its network of paid subscribers constituted a public performance of copyrighted works owned by ABC within the meaning of the Copyright Act’s “Transmit Clause” (17 U.S.C. § 101), thereby infringing ABC’s exclusive right to perform its copyrighted works publicly.
This ruling infers that the transmission of any other copyrighted materials (articles, images, songs…) over the Internet to paid subscribers would constitute infringement of the copyright owner's rights.
Thursday, June 26, 2014
Be Careful Firing Employees For Screaming At You
MY CAVEAT: In view of the United States Supreme Court’s ruling of June 26, 2014 (National Labor Relations Board v. Noel Canning et al., the following may be suspect as precedent for future decisions.
Note to small-business owners: Be very careful firing
employees for screaming at you.
The invaluable Overlawyered blog alerts us to two recent
decisions by the National Labor Relations Board. The first involved a staff
meeting at a car dealership in Yuma, Ariz., where a worker lost his cool and
called his supervisors -- well, let's just say several variations of the f-bomb.
He stood up, shoved his chair aside and told them they'd regret it if they
fired him.
He was duly fired... but the NLRB found his termination
"an unlawful violation of the employee's rights to engage in the protected
concerted activity."
Meanwhile, a man trying to unionize four Starbucks in
Manhattan told a manager to go, umm, have self-induced carnal knowledge. In
front of customers, he said this. For which he was duly fired.
The Seattle Post-Intelligencer reports the NLRB ordered
Starbucks to offer him his old job "or a substantially equivalent
position, compensate him for any loss of earnings and other benefits and remove
from its files any references to the unlawful firing."
We can only imagine how awkward that first day back might
be...
Dave Gonigam, The 5 Min. Forecast, Agora Financial, June 25,
2014
Thursday, January 9, 2014
One Less (NLRB) Poster!
The National Labor
Relations Board (NLRB) has abandoned its rule which required private sector
employers to post an “Employee Rights under the National Labor Relations Act”
notice, which turned out to be an 11"x17" poster informing employees of their general rights under the National Labor Relations Act. This results from the NLRB's decision not to seek US Supreme Court
review of two US Court of Appeals decisions which invalidated this NLRB notice
posting rule putting an end to the poster requirement.
Tuesday, November 12, 2013
Veterans Benefits and Eligibility Requirments
| Name * Required |
| Email * Required |
| Phone * Required |
| Question or Comments |
| Submit |
| Veterans benefits are perhaps the most misunderstood and underutilized resources available to millions of veterans and their families. While it is commonly known that certain benefits are available for the brave men and women who served in our armed forces, many veterans (and their families) are unaware that they could be eligible for a wide range of benefits through the United States Department of Veterans Affairs even if they did not directly retire from the military or suffer injuries in the line of duty. Veterans Benefits offered to eligible beneficiaries include:
Unfortunately, many of the eligible beneficiaries are initially denied these benefits when a claim is filed. Applicants should be aware that the decisions for these claims can be appealed by veterans and their eligible family members. Once a claim has been filed and consequently denied, the veteran or other potentially eligible beneficiary has sixty days to file for an appeal with their regional office. Legislation was passed and came into effect on June 20, 2007 which provides veterans the option of retaining an attorney after the first denial by the Department of Veterans Affairs at the “Notice of Disagreement” (NOD) stage. The Department of Veterans Affairs benefits claims and appeals process can be complicated. If a veteran or a veteran’s family members have received a denial of benefits to which they believe they are entitled, it is in their best interest to contact an attorney who is familiar with veterans benefits to assist them with the application and appeals process. Orange County attorney Bradley S. Erdosi is an Accredited Veterans Attorney and has counseled many veterans and their families in obtaining benefits, including the Aid and Attendance benefit. Courtesy of Bradley Erdosi ~ Please feel free to contact him...not me! |
Thursday, May 30, 2013
Working at Home during Family and Medical Leave (FMLA)
More employees who are physically unable to come to work are performing work for their employer from home. Please note that performing work for the employer from home does not count against the 12-week leave allotment under FMLA. It is therefore important both for the employee and the employer to document when and if the employee on FMLA leave is performing work tasks from home, as the hours spent performing those tasks should be deducted from any calculation of FMLA leave used. Perhaps, if technology allows, the employee would have to work through the employer's network, which could track these hours, or at least the employee would contemporaneously record the time, subject matter, client, etc. of the work on the network.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)